Gain visibility across fragmented change programmes.
Pometry builds a live, reconciled model of the systems your teams already work in, so the plan stays connected to what is actually happening across the portfolio.
Reclaimable spend identified at a tier one bank
Reduction in programme delivery time at a global corporate
From engagement to first findings
A single forward-deployed engineer, with no data movement
Coordination overhead compounds faster than anyone can track it.
A single migration can involve several core product teams, support teams, business lines and applications. Leaders plan around a web of dependencies that changes daily, reconciled from dozens of programme managers reporting at different times.
No temporal visibility
Existing tools capture snapshots. They can't show how a dependency evolved, when a bottleneck formed, or which decision caused a downstream delay.
Reporting lags reality
By the time an issue reaches a status report it is weeks old, and the root cause has compounded into something harder to unwind.
Nobody holds the whole picture
Resource concentration, priority dilution and systemic failure patterns sit across team boundaries, where no single owner can see them.
“If the signs were visible six months ago, why didn't we act before the risk became a crisis?”
Chief Information Officer, global bankPlan, track and report from one reconciled model.
Pometry reads the work-management and engineering systems your teams already use, so individual contributors carry on exactly as they are.
Critical path analysis
Dependencies computed across teams, application inventories and past programmes, without anyone assembling them by hand from team-level plans.
Live planning support
Re-sequencing and scope options ranked by how many days each removes from the critical path.
Continuous forecasting
Delivery estimates computed from your own work-management and engineering systems, not from industry benchmarks.
Live alerts
Blockers, bottlenecks and dependencies flagged as they form, each with a traceable record and a suggested action.
Reconciled status updates
Updates at application, programme and initiative level, produced without disrupting individual contributors for a manual return.
Upward reports
Drafted from the model with every line traceable to source, alongside meeting preparation for PMO teams.
Measuring impact at a tier 1 bank
Pometry analysed £1.3bn of transformation spend and reached first findings in three weeks, against a competing proposal that quoted six months. £400M of it proved reclaimable. These are four of the patterns behind that number.
Avoidable cancellations
Hundreds of thousands of person-days spent on work that was cancelled, most of it predictable from the pattern of earlier cancellations.
Incident loops
Around 30% of total work time went on SLA breach handling that looped between teams instead of resolving, with the same incident classes recurring across unrelated programmes.
Resource concentration
A third of critical-path work was assigned to staff who were already oversubscribed, because no one had a complete view of allocation across teams.
Priority dilution
Formal prioritisation had little bearing on the order work was actually executed in. Pometry identified where the two diverged.
Experience Pometry in action
with a live demo.
Find out how you can close your visibility gap with unique, institutional intelligence.